Outpatient vs Inpatient Single-Port Robotic Urologic Surgery: Perioperative Outcomes and Complications.

INTRODUCTION: The da Vinci Single Port (SP) robotic surgical system has minimized the impact of surgery on patients. Hence, outpatient robotic procedures are being explored to reduce costs and improve patient experience. Here, we evaluate the perioperative outcomes and safety of same-day discharge (SDD) after surgery compared to inpatient procedures using the SP. METHODS: A total of 374 patients underwent surgery with the da Vinci SP system between January 2019 and February 2023. Surgeries were performed in a single high-volume center. Patients were either managed with a standardized outpatient or inpatient protocol. SDD clinical pathway was implemented in June 2021. Patients were assessed for discharge eligibility based on specific guidelines. Detailed instructions were provided at discharge, and patients were followed postoperatively. Baseline characteristics, perioperative data, complications, time to complication, and readmissions were assessed. RESULTS: Two hundred eight patients underwent outpatient surgery and 166 underwent inpatient surgery (total = 374). Outpatient surgery was not associated with increased postoperative complications and readmission compared to inpatient surgery. Ninety percent and 74.6% of patients experienced no complications in the outpatient and inpatient populations, respectively (P =< .001). Time to first complication was also comparable between the 2 groups (3 days [IQR 1-8] vs 10 days [IQR 4-30] for outpatient vs inpatient; P = .3). The proportion of successful SDDs increased over time, reaching 88% in October 2022. CONCLUSIONS: Outpatient surgery using the da Vinci SP is safe and feasible, without increasing postoperative complications compared to standard inpatient surgery.

Single port robot-assisted radical and simple prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Aim of our study was to review the current evidence on single port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (SP-RARP) and SP robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (SP-RASP) procedures. METHODS: A comprehensive bibliographic search on multiple databases was conducted in July 2023. Studies were included if they assessed patients with non-metastatic prostate cancer or candidate for benign prostatic hyperplasia surgery (P) who underwent SP-RARP or SP-RASP, respectively, (I), compared or not with other surgical techniques (C), evaluating perioperative, oncological, or functional outcomes (O). Prospective and retrospective original articles were included (S). A meta-analysis of comparative studies between SP-RARP and MP-RARP was performed. RESULTS: A total of 21 studies investigating 1400 patients were included in our systematic review, 18 were related to SP-RARP while 3 to SP-RASP. Only 8 comparative studies were eligible for meta-analysis. Mean follow-up was 8.1 (±5.8) months. Similar outcomes were observed for SP-RARP and MP-RARP in terms of operative time, catheterization time, pain score, complications rate, continence and potency rates, positive surgical margin, and biochemical recurrence. Length of hospital stay was shorter in the SP group after sensitivity analysis (WMD -0.58, 95% IC -1.17 to -0.9, p < 0.05). Subgroup analysis by extraperitoneal approach did not show any statistical difference, except for a lower positive margins rate in the SP extraperitoneal technique compared to MP-RARP. Overall, SP-RASP exhibited shorter hospital stay and lower rate of de novo urinary incontinence when compared to other techniques, while no differences were reported in terms of postoperative International Prostate Symptom Score, post void residual and maximum flow. CONCLUSIONS: Overall comparable oncological, functional, and perioperative outcomes can be achieved with SP platform. Subgroup analysis by different approaches did not reveal significant variations in outcomes. However, the retrospective nature of the studies, the limited follow-up, and the relatively small sample size of selected Centers may impact these results.

Application of the single-port robotic platform during radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: feasibility of the single-port robot in the multi-quadrant setting.

Urothelial carcinoma of the upper tract (UTUC) is a malignancy that accounts for 5-10% of all urothelial carcinomas. Radical surgery is the primary treatment option due to the high rate of invasive stages at the time of diagnosis. Nephroureterectomy (NU) with bladder cuff excision is the current standard of care. While laparoscopic NU has been established since 1991, many centres still perform open surgery due to the complexity of laparoscopic instrumentation and the steep learning curve for excising the bladder cuff. With the increasing adoption of the multi-port (MP) robotic surgery, NU has increasingly been performed using this platform. The use of MP robotic systems for NU has been challenged by the need for patient repositioning and/or redocking of the robot, which can consume valuable operative time. The transition from the daVinci Si to the daVinci Xi system has seen a noticeable reduction in redocking and patient repositioning. However, owing to the multi-quadrant nature of the surgery in question, the use of multiple ports and external instrument clashing are still persistent problems. Moreover, there is a growing interest in utilizing a retroperitoneal approach for robot-assisted NU due to its potential benefits such as improved control of hilar structures, reduction of blood loss, shorter operative time and hospital stay, reduced complications and decreased postoperative discomfort. The application of the daVinci single-port (SP) robotic platform during radical NU for UTUC is feasible and has the potential to improve the current surgical approach. Indeed, the use of a SP platform may solve the problem of patient repositioning and redocking of the robot, improve superficial aesthetic outcome and minimize external instrument clashing. While maintaining an optimal oncological control, the retroperitoneal approach, which has been difficult to replicate and adopt using the MP approach, may become standard practice. However, more studies are needed to confirm the benefit of this approach and ultimately determine the impact of the daVinci SP on the management of UTUC.

Robot-assisted Surgery in the Field of Urology: The Most Pioneering Approaches 2015-2023.

Robot-assisted surgery has emerged as a transformative technology, revolutionizing surgical approaches and techniques that decades ago could barely be imagined. The field of urology has taken charge in pioneering a new era of minimally invasive surgery with the ascent of robotic systems which offer enhanced visualization, precision, dexterity, and enabling surgeons to perform intricate maneuvers with improved accuracy. This has led to improved surgical outcomes, including reduced blood loss, lower complication rates, and faster patient recovery. The aim of our review is to present an evidence-based critical analysis on the most pioneering robotic urologic approaches described over the last eight years (2015-2023).

Single-Port Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Where Do We Stand?

In 2018, the da Vinci Single Port (SP) robotic system was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for urologic procedures. Available studies for the application of SP to prostate cancer surgery are limited. The aim of our study is to summarize the current evidence on the techniques and outcomes of SP robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (SP-RARLP) procedures. A narrative review of the literature was performed in January 2023. Preliminary results suggest that SP-RALP is safe and feasible, and it can offer comparable outcomes to the standard multiport RALP. Extraperitoneal and transvesical SP-RALP appear to be the two most promising approaches, as they offer decreased invasiveness, potentially shorter length of stay, and better pain control. Long-term, high-quality data are missing and further validation with prospective studies across different sites is required.

Simplifying Retroperitoneal Robotic Single-port Surgery: Novel Supine Anterior Retroperitoneal Access.

BACKGROUND: Multiport robotic surgery in the retroperitoneum is limited by the bulky robotic frame and clashing of instruments. Moreover, patients are placed in the lateral decubitus position, which has been linked to complications. OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility and safety of a supine anterior retroperitoneal access (SARA) technique with the da Vinci Single-Port (SP) robotic platform. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Between October 2022 and January 2023, 18 patients underwent surgery using the SARA technique for renal cancer, urothelial cancer, or ureteral stenosis. Perioperative variables were prospectively collected and outcomes were assessed. SURGICAL PROCEDURE: With the patient in a supine position, a 3-cm incision is made at the McBurney point and the abdominal muscles are dissected. Finger dissection is used to develop the retroperitoneal space for the da Vinci SP access port. After docking, the first step is to dissect retroperitoneal tissue to reveal the psoas muscle. This allows identification of the ureter, the inferior renal pole, and the hilum. MEASUREMENTS: A descriptive statistical analysis was performed. Data collected included demographics, operative time, warm ischemia time (WIT), surgical margin status, complications, length of hospital stay, 30-d Clavien-Dindo complications, and postoperative narcotic use. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Twelve patients underwent partial nephrectomy (PN) and two each underwent pyeloplasty, radical nephroureterectomy, and radical nephrectomy. In the PN group, mean age was 57 yr (interquartile range [IQR] 30-73), median body mass index was 32 kg/m2 (IQR 17-58), and 25% had stage ≥3 chronic kidney disease. The median Charlson comorbidity index was 3 (IQR 0-7) and 75% of PN patients had an American Society of Anesthesiologists score ≥3. The median RENAL score was 5 (IQR 4-7). The median WIT was 25 min (IQR 16-48) and the median tumor size was 35 mm (IQR 16-50). The median estimated blood loss was 105 ml (IQR 20-400) and the median operative time was 160 min (IQR 110-200). Positive surgical margins were found in one patient. In the overall cohort, one patient was readmitted and managed conservatively; 83% of the PN group were discharged on the same day as their surgery, with the remainder discharged the next day. At 7 d after surgery, no patients reported narcotic use. CONCLUSIONS: The SARA approach is feasible and safe. Larger studies are needed to confirm this approach as a one-step solution for upper urinary tract surgery. PATIENT SUMMARY: We assessed initial outcomes of a novel approach for accessing the retroperitoneum (the space behind the abdominal cavity and in front of the back muscles and spine) during robot-assisted surgery in the upper urinary tract. The patient is placed on their back and surgery is performed with a single-port robot. Our results show that this approach was feasible and safe, with low complication rates, less postoperative pain, and earlier discharge. This is a promising start, but larger studies are needed to confirm our findings.

Multidisciplinary team referral at diagnosis for patients with non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: To date, multidisciplinary team (MDT) evaluation, enrollment in trials evaluating the role of perioperative therapies and deferred active treatments represent accepted strategies for patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC), which are under investigation to maximize cancer control and implement health care policies and value-based care. Here, we aimed to identify subgroups of patients with RCC who may benefit from early referral for MDT evaluation at diagnosis in light of an increased risk of recurrence relative to the risk of dying of other causes. METHODS: We relied on a prospective dataset including patients diagnosed with RCC from 1998 to 2019 and treated by means of surgery alone at a tertiary referral center. The risk of other cause mortality (OCM) was evaluated against the risk of distant metastasis over time by means of the Weibull regression. Patients were stratified based on clinical stage (cT1a; cT1b; cT2; cT3-4), age (<60; 60-70; >70) and comorbidities [Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) 0 vs. ≥1]. For each combination of cT stage, age, and CCI, the potential need for an MDT referral was defined when the risk of recurrence exceeded the risk of OCM within the lower limit of the 95% CI of the meantime to recurrence. MAIN FINDINGS: Overall, 1,162 (51%) patients had no comorbidities. Median follow-up was 7 years. Patients who would benefit most from an MDT evaluation are those diagnosed with A) cT3-4 disease (any age or comorbidity) or B) cT2 cancers if healthy and younger than 70 years or younger than 60 years with at least 1 comorbidity or C) cT1b if younger than 60 years and without comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings can help selecting the optimal candidates for multidisciplinary evaluations and to consider RCC patients for clinical trials, deferred treatment, and treatment policy improvement. Also, our findings can be useful in the case of major healthcare disruptions, such as pandemics.